Dutch term
valt niet in te zien op grond waarvan
it is not possible to see on what basis?
3 +1 | the grounds on which ... cannot be ascertained | Oliver Pekelharing |
4 +4 | it is impossible to see why | Chris Hopley |
Non-PRO (1): Buck
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
the grounds on which ... cannot be ascertained
Thanks for confirmation |
it is impossible to see why
Thanks for confirmation |
This would be more likely to be what would write in English |
agree |
Oliver Pekelharing
: .. if the client wants Dutch blah blah turned into plain English.
9 mins
|
agree |
Richard Sanders
: agree
22 mins
|
agree |
philgoddard
: You could say "hard", which can be a polite way of saying "impossible".
4 hrs
|
I agree, an equally valid option
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
3 days 4 hrs
|
Something went wrong...