4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "From a bit more googling, this appears to be the equivalent term in English usage. 'foutloos aansprakelijk' is apparently a contraction of 'zonder (bewezen) fout, aansprakelijk', and as suggested by the source I found, this can also be designated as 'objectively liable'. However, 'objective' seems to be used mainly in continental European contexts in this connection (except in quasi-academic contexts in other countries), and I found at least one native English source that gave 'objective' as an equivalent of 'strict'. I suspect (perhaps naively) that 'unlimited' may be misleading here, since the liability in question explicity excludes force majeure and possibly other factors deemed outside the control of the party concerned, and the extent of the compensation is apparently also subject to defined limits."