Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Dec 1, 2008 16:03
15 yrs ago
Japanese term
United States
Fast, accurate, highest quality
Native in: English 
, Spanish
Works in: Japanese to English, English to Japanese, Japanese to Spanish, and 4 more.
することとなる
Japanese to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
From the defense attorney's arguments in a JFTC ruling, which is definitely splitting hairs in my opinion, but in any case the argument makes a distinction between 「すること」、「することとなる」、「するおそれがある」。Here is the whole phrase: 特許・ノウハウガイドラインの用語によれば，本件非係争条項が違法となるのは，本件非係争条項によって，「ライセンシーの研究開発の意欲を損ない，新たな技術の開発を阻害すること」の場合であり，「ライセンシーの研究開発の意欲を損ない，新たな技術の開発を阻害『するおそれがある』」や「ライセンシーの研究開発意欲を損ない，新たな技術の開発を阻害『することとなる』」では足りない
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 | may end up in |
humbird
|
| 3 +2 | will impede |
yuzouren
|
| 3 +1 | may come down or lead to...(impeding further development...) |
peter arnout
|
Change log
Dec 8, 2008 02:25: humbird changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/119147">David Higbee-Teves's</a> old entry - "することとなる"" to ""may end up in ""
Proposed translations
4 hrs
Selected
may end up in
Hello Davi, you appear to be battling with very interesting subject. I understand it is quite a challenge.
As for this question of yours, it seems to me that what they are talking about is the matter of clarification and comparison.
In other words, these three are 「すること」、vs. 「するおそれがある」 and 「することとなる」 comparison.
Therefore, the first is definitive (and illegal). The latter two are suppositions, thereby do not qualify to be so.
Merely being 「するおそれがある」 and 「することとなる」 are not sufficient to be illegal.
You are right, they are splitting the hair. But することとなる is not quite there.
HTH
BTW, please do not post "agree", "neutral" and "disagree" without knowing what being at issue.
As for this question of yours, it seems to me that what they are talking about is the matter of clarification and comparison.
In other words, these three are 「すること」、vs. 「するおそれがある」 and 「することとなる」 comparison.
Therefore, the first is definitive (and illegal). The latter two are suppositions, thereby do not qualify to be so.
Merely being 「するおそれがある」 and 「することとなる」 are not sufficient to be illegal.
You are right, they are splitting the hair. But することとなる is not quite there.
HTH
BTW, please do not post "agree", "neutral" and "disagree" without knowing what being at issue.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+1
10 mins
peter arnout
Belgium
Belgium
Works in field
Belgium
Getting Better all the Time
Native in: Dutch
Works in: English to Dutch, French to Dutch, Dutch to English, and 5 more.
may come down or lead to...(impeding further development...)
guess
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Yumico Tanaka (X)
8 hrs
|
+2
36 mins
will impede
”おそれがある”may impede or possibly impede...., have the possibility to impede...
”こととなる” will result in impeding.... will lead to
"すること” will impede...
”こととなる” will result in impeding.... will lead to
"すること” will impede...
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
michiko tsum (X)
: very good! The questioned term is not what you input as an answer but I agree with your explanations.
1 hr
|
| neutral |
Yumico Tanaka (X)
: If the question included 阻害 I would have totally agreed.
8 hrs
|
| agree |
sigmalanguage
: Cannot agree with "will impede" = "阻害することとなる", but I agree with your explanation that "阻害することとなる" = "will result in impeding".
12 hrs
|
Something went wrong...